Professional Legal Services | Islamabad, Pakistan
Aadils Advocates & Legal Consultants
- info@aadils.pk
- +92 51 228 7202
Legal Insights
Expert commentary, legal analysis, and perspectives on evolving legal issues.
Our Professional Journey in Visuals
Our gallery reflects the professional environment in which our legal team operates, showcasing key legal engagements, institutional interactions, and moments that define our commitment to legal excellence.
CRITICAL EVIDENCE-TYPE OF CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE
ABSTRACT: Whenever you are doing something unusual or different in public, there is an apprehension for being captured by safe city camera or any private surveillance camera or maybe by a mobile camera in hand of any person around you. This is the deterrence which stops you from doing something embarrassing or illegal in public place. Going one step ahead of the current situation that once you are recorded then what is the impact of such video footage in our criminal justice system.
VIDEO RECORDING AS A PIECE OF EVIDENCE
ABSTRACT: This is the most challenging step which is faced by the criminal justice system in present days. Almost every crime of conventional nature from pocket picking to terrorist attacks involve electronic evidence. Our Police is capable but due to lack of resources the required result cannot be achieved. Government policy is hard work instead of smart work. Government is only focusing on structural changes like deputing SHO on an SHO. We need to come with policies based on resources. All the tiers of criminal justice system are very much dependent and connected with the appreciation of electronic evidence. It is an admitted fact that the legal appreciation of such piece of evidence has become discretion of the court due to incompetent investigation and patchy laws. IS Video Recording piece of Evidence?
LEGAL RECOGNITION OF ELECTRONIC EVIDENCE AND ELECTRONIC TRIAL
ABSTRACT: Living in an era of technology and setting our goals to achieve compatibility between the manmade laws and technologies is a difficult task. Although both are manmade but synchronizing them is never an easy task. Similar to this proposition efforts are made to conduct trials using technology as a medium for legal recognition. Before these efforts the only recognized medium was direct evidence recorded in physical presence of the witness and documents exhibited in physical form in the trial court. There were very few exceptions which were ever recognized ignoring the principle of hearsay which were practiced scarcely and appreciated rarely by the courts.